leadership action plan power point slideshow

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

power point Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to present the best plan of action, as a leader, assigned to make a change to a problem or issue in your place of work. If you are not presently working, use information from your prelicensure experience or previous healthcare experience. You will be using the Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals to align with the problem or issue that you see in your workplace or most recent place of employment. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation and share how you will meet one of the goals in your place of work that will solve the problem or issue you have selected.

Directions

  1. Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-15 slides. Include the following. Title slide, written speaker notes, and Reference slide. Do not use Voice Over recordings. All information needs to be written in slides and notes.
  2. As the leader, you have identified a problem or issue related to one of the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 created by the Joint Commission that will lead to quality improvement. You will find the National Patient Safety Goals using this link: https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2019_HA… (Links to an external site.)
  3. Assess the problem or issue. State the problem/issue and identify three rationales (reasons) that the problem exists. References are used.
  4. Determine the people who are involved in the issue and explain three reasons as to how their role will contribute to the problem or issue solution.
  5. Identify three solutions and discuss the purpose, cost and desired outcome.
  6. Pick one solution to share with the director and discuss why this solution was chosen over the others. Use a scholarly reference.
  7. Make an action plan to share the solution with the director and staff.
  8. Summarize issue, plan and desired outcome and purpose for quality improvement on slide.
  9. Reflect on your learning and value of doing the assignment.
  10. Include written speaker notes for all slides except title slide and reference slide.

Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Presentations

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

  • Be creative.
  • Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
  • Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.
  • Review directions thoroughly.
  • Proofread prior to final submission.
  • Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slideSlide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

10.0 pts

Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member

9.0 pts

Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing.

8.0 pts

Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.

4.0 pts

Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.

0.0 pts

Title slide is missing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAn issue is determined based on the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 PDF and there are facts with support from references explaining why it is an issue. References are used.

20.0 pts

At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the issue selected based on the National Patient Safety Goals. References are used.

18.0 pts

Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the National Patient Safety Goals. References are included.

16.0 pts

One reason is included and is logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the National Patient Safety Goal. Few references are used.

8.0 pts

One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective. No references are used.

0.0 pts

No reasons given to support why the issue is a concern or issue is not a National Patient Safety Goal.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLists the stakeholders (people) who are involved in the issue and explains how each role will contribute to the problem solution

30.0 pts

At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

26.0 pts

Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

24.0 pts

One reason is included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

11.0 pts

One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the potential staff member’s perspective.

0.0 pts

No reasons are given to recommend hospital care to potential staff members.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss solutions to the problem weighing the stakeholders, cost, and reachable outcomes of each solution.

30.0 pts

Three solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted thoroughly and clearly.

26.0 pts

Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted clearly.

24.0 pts

Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution is briefly discussed, omitting some information.

11.0 pts

One solution is listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the solution is noted.

0.0 pts

No solutions are noted or discussed.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePicks one solution to share with the director and discusses why this solution was chosen over the others.

30.0 pts

One solution is chosen. Thoroughly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference.

26.0 pts

One solution is chosen. Mostly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference.

24.0 pts

One solution is chosen. Briefly describes why this solution was better than the other one but lacks clear support for this idea. Does not use a reference.

11.0 pts

One solution is chosen. Description is not clear and does not explain why the other solution was not chosen. No references were used.

0.0 pts

No solution was chosen or described. No references were used.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShares best approach to deliver solution to director and staff.

30.0 pts

Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is thoroughly described in detail.

26.0 pts

Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is somewhat described in detail.

24.0 pts

Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is briefly described in detail.

11.0 pts

Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is described but difficult to ascertain.

0.0 pts

Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is not noted.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of issue, plan, and desired outcome for the plan is clear and relates to the previous slides.

20.0 pts

Summary is clear and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement and desired outcomes.

18.0 pts

Summary is noted and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

16.0 pts

Summary is briefly noted and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

8.0 pts

Summary is not clear and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes. Some pieces may be omitted.

0.0 pts

No summary is completed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

18.0 pts

Generally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

16.0 pts

Briefly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

8.0 pts

Minimally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment does NOT include value of data.

0.0 pts

Reflection on learning related leadership action plan assignment including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and formatting. Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References are in APA format.

10.0 pts

All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References are in correct APA format

9.0 pts

Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are in correct APA format

8.0 pts

Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

5.0 pts

Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

0.0 pts

Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides. References are not in correct APA format

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeaker Notes Present

0.0 pts

Speaker Notes Present – no deduction in points

0.0 pts

Speaker notes not present on 80% of the slides results in a 10% deduction (20 points).

0.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper