ops400 mod6 portfolio milestone

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

I have attached the working copy of my portfolio milestone project and an outline. Please do not exceed the already long page count. I say this because it was the only negative comment on the attached paper. He said everything else looked great. 

I would ask that you continue to refine the paper:

    Adding additional sources

Additional content

Condensing page count where you can.

If you have any questions please ask. FILLER TEXT

FILLER TEXT

          Module 6: Portfolio Milestone         

Points 30 

Submitting a file upload 

  • Portfolio Milestone (30 Points)

Continue working on your Portfolio Project, referring to the  Portfolio Project assignment and corresponding Portfolio Project grading  rubric in Module 8. The Portfolio Project will be due at the end of the  course before midnight of Week 8.

In your project, complete the third bulleted item, “Operations Management”; the details for this milestone are:

Operations Management: Define OM and relate the subject  organization’s mission, operational strategy, and productivity  measurements; compare and contrast OM with project management.

Rubric

  • OPS400 Mod 6 PM 

OPS400 Mod 6 PM 

   Criteria

   Ratings

     Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 

 

20.0 to >16.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Outline includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Outline includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >8.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Outline includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Outline includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material 

 

10.0 to >8.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Sources  well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the  issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

8.0 to >6.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0 to >4.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

4.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

                        FILLER TEXT

FILLER TEXT           

Module 8: Portfolio Project         

Points 275 

Submitting a file upload 

Portfolio Project (275 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do  not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title  of your submission.

Common Portfolio Project Requirements: Operations Management

Note: Your final Portfolio Project is due for submission this week.

The final Portfolio Project is structured to help demonstrate your  understanding of the course material, as well as the implications of new  knowledge gained from outside research. You will choose an organization  which may be your workplace, an organization that you are familiar  with, or an organization discovered in your research. Information about  the subject organization must be publicly available and properly  referenced in your work. As part of the initial Portfolio Project  milestone due in Module 4, you must secure instructor approval for the  organization selected for your Portfolio Project.

Based on your analysis, write an assessment about the subject  organization’s OM strategy and practices. When writing the assessment,  assume the role of a highly-regarded operations management professional  commissioned to review, analyze, and describe the organization’s OM for  achieving increased sustainable business value. Your assessment should  address the following key elements:

Organization: Name and briefly describe an organization  of your choice, including its mission. (This will be the subject of the  first of three Portfolio Milestones, due at the end of Module 2.)

Overview: Provide an overview of this paper so the  reader gets familiarity with the purpose, content, and overall  organization of the paper. ( This will be the subject of the second of  three Portfolio Milestones, due at the end of Module 4.)

Operations Management: Define OM and relate the subject  organization’s mission, operational strategy, and productivity  measurements; compare and contrast OM with project management. (This  will be the subject of the third and last of three Portfolio Milestones,  due at the end of Module 6.)

OM Forecasting: Define forecasting in the context of  OM, identify the subject organization’s forecasting methods and  practices, relate the Seven Steps in the forecasting system to the  subject organization, highlight potential ethical considerations related  to the subject organization’s forecasting, and recap applicable lessons  learned based on your forecasting simulation experience.

Define Operations: Define design of goods and services  and relate it to the subject organization, and highlight the OM process,  location, and human resource strategy in the context of the subject  organization.

Quality Management: Define quality and identify common  OM quality management best practices, identify the subject  organization’s quality management methodology, and recap the applicable  lessons learned based on your quality management simulation experience.  Additionally, build a house of quality to show five customer  requirements and product/service characteristics to meet them. Explain  the process of product characteristics selection and how these customer  requirements are met.

Human Resources, Job Design, and Work Measurement:  Define the role of human resources, job design, and work measurement in  ensuring competitiveness and high productivity for the subject  organization.

Supply Chain Management: Define supply chain management  (SCM), designate the subject organization’s SCM strategy and explain  the basis for determination, describe the subject organization’s use of  technology for SCM, identify potential SCM risks and SCM ethical  considerations related to the subject organization, and recap the  applicable lessons learned in your supply chain management simulation  experience.

Inventory Management: Define inventory management, its  importance, and common inventory models; identify the subject  organization’s inventory management practices; and identify potential  ethical considerations related to the subject organization.

Operations Manager Job Description: Imagine you are  hiring an operations manager for this company. Prepare a comprehensive  job description with clearly articulated bulleted duties that describes  what is expected for this role (no more than two pages).

Conclusion: Provide key lessons learned from various sections and a summary of the paper (less than one page).

References: (Portfolio Milestone 3, due at the end of Module 4; you can also add more references after Module 4.)

Submit your Portfolio Project paper as a single Microsoft Word  document to the Module 8 submissions area established for this purpose.

Your essay should address the following requirements:

Your well-written OM assessment essay thesis should be 12 to 15  pages in length, which does not include the required title, reference,  of appendix pages.

Format your paper per the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.), which includes an introduction and conclusion.

Include a title and a reference page.

Cite at least six current (within last five years) scholarly  references, excluding our or other textbooks, to support your assertions  and conclusions.

Include an appendix for tables and figures.

Please write clearly, concisely, and cohesively; use section level headers to organize the key elements of your thesis.

Option #1: Product-Based Operations Management AssessmentFILLER TEXT 

The purpose of the Portfolio Project is to apply your synthesis of  current research about operations management (OM) to a global  product-oriented organization. For your Portfolio Project, you are  required to select a global organization that has a predominately  product-oriented mission as the subject for your OM assessment.

Option #2: Service-Based Operations Management AssessmentFILLER TEXT 

The purpose of the Portfolio Project is to apply your synthesis of  current research about operations management (OM) to a global  service-oriented organization. For your Portfolio Project, you are  required to select a global organization that has a predominately  service-oriented mission as the subject for your OM assessment.

Rubric

OPS400 Mod 8 PP 

 

OPS400 Mod 8 PP 

 Criteria Ratings        Pts           

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 

  

40.0 to >32.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Demonstrates  strong or adequate knowledge of operations management; correctly  represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0 to >24.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0 to >16.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

16.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 

  

30.0 to >24.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >18.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Operations Management Simulations Lessons Learned 

  

25.0 to >20.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Provides strong critical thinking and reflective insights about operations management simulations lessons learned.

20.0 to >15.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Mostly provides critical thinking and reflective insights about simulations lessons learned.

15.0 to >10.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Provides limited critical thinking and reflective insights about simulations lessons learned.

10.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

  • Fails to demonstrate critical thinking and reflective insights about simulations lessons learned.

25.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis 

  •   

30.0 to >24.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding operations management.

24.0 to >18.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

18.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

12.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.

30.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

  • This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis 

  

  • 30.0 to >24.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of operations management.

24.0 to >18.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

  • Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.

  • 18.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis.

12.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

  • Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.

  • 30.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

  • This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation 

  

  • 30.0 to >24.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in operations management.

24.0 to >18.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

  • Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

18.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

  • 12.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence
  • Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

30.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

  •  
  • This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources 
  •   

15.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least five to six credible sources.

12.0 to >9.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates four to five credible sources.

9.0 to >6.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Cites and integrates three to four credible source.

6.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material 

  

15.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Sources  well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the  issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

12.0 to >9.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

9.0 to >6.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 

  

20.0 to >16.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Project  is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format  including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project  requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Small  number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing;  is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project  requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Major  problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper  essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project  requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style 

  

20.0 to >16.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Strong  sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and  spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no  unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Inconsistent  to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on  grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style. 

  

20.0 to >16.0 pts                                  Meets Expectation

Project  contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to  Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 pts                                  Approaches Expectation

Few  errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing  and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 pts                                  Below Expectation

Significant  errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing  and APA, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 pts                                  Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT            

 

        Total Points:                            275.0                              

     FILLER TEXT

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper