pjm310 introduction to project management critical thinking 4 page essay

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Required

Recommended

Module 4: Critical Thinking

  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload

Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: WBS and Activity Network

Select a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop an activity network for your project similar to those shown in Figures 8.2 and 8.3 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and activity network should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and activity network are and how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices. The appendices should include calculations, diagrams, and table.

Submission Requirements

  • Prepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the appendix with your WBS and network diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.
  • Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.
  • Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.

Option #2: WBS and RACI Matrix

Select a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop a RACI matrix for your project similar to that shown in Figure 6.9 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and RACI matrix should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and RACI matrix are, how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices.

Submission Requirements

  • Prepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the with your WBS and RACI diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.
  • Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.
  • Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.

Rubric

PJM310 Mod 4 CT

PJM310 Mod 4 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

This response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

This response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

This response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

This response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the project management concepts.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the project management concepts.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omission in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to provide analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and well written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper