case study on pp. 387-392, The trial court found that Stengart did not have a legitimate expectation, assignment help

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Read the case study on pp. 387-392 of the textbook and answer the following questions:

1. The trial court found that Stengart did not have a legitimate expectation of privacy when sending personal emails through the company’s laptop. The appellate court and the Supreme Court disagreed. Discuss the reasoning that the higher courts had in reversing the trial court.

All posts must be a minimum of 250-300 words.

2. What effect would this decision have on a company when thinking about forming company policy regarding personal communication?

Read the case study on pp. 417-419 of the textbook and answer the following questions:

3.
Would a state antispam statute that specifically prohibited
pornographic, obscene, terroristic, and fraudulent emailing withstand
constitutional scrutiny? Why or why not?

4.
Is spam really so bad? Why can a business lawfully send unsolicityed
traditional mail, or make unsolicited phone calls (as long as their is
no violation of a no-call list) but spamming violates the law?

Synthesis of Concepts

55

Clear Citations using APA format

10

Writing Standards

10

Peer Reviews (minimum of 2) – Responses posted after the current week will not be accepted

25


Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper