identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

The purpose of this assignment is to learn about information literacy by exploring the concept of peer review. You may be familiar with peer review in prior writing courses, but what does it mean when you talk about peer review in relation to academic source material? Click on the following link to a DeVry University Library presentation of Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.

After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

  • In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.
  • How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.
  • Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?
  • As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?

Submit your assignment by the due date.

Rubric

ENGL 147N Week 2 Info Literacy Assignment Rubric (35pts)

ENGL 147N Week 2 Info Literacy Assignment Rubric (35pts)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately identifies points in the peer review cycle that seem important and explains why.

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains how an editor differs from a peer reviewer with at least two points for support.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains whether or not the article was peer reviewed and how this was determined.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness and Deadlines

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Writing Quality

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

Total Points: 35.0

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper