QUESTION 2 – EGGSHELL SKULLS Consider Vosburg v. Putney, an 1891 Wisconsin case. Putney, age 11, kicked Vosburg, age 14, in the leg during school.

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

QUESTION 2 – EGGSHELL SKULLS

Consider Vosburg v. Putney, an 1891 Wisconsin case. Putney, age 11, kicked Vosburg, age 14, in the

leg during school. The kick was not very hard – the jury found that “defendant, in touching the

plaintiff with his foot, did not intend to do him any harm.” However, Vosburg was recovering from

an earlier sledding injury to the same spot, and the light kick somehow caused Vosburg to

permanently lose the use of his leg. The court ruled that, even though Putney had no way of

knowing Vosburg was so fragile, he (his parents) was liable for the harm done.

This is an example of the “eggshell skull” principle in tort law – even if someone has a skull as

fragile as an eggshell, if you tap them on the head and break their skull, you’re still liable.

This is also described as the doctrine that “we take our victims as we find them.”

(a) Recall that in the contract case, Hadley v Baxendale (the miller and the shipper), Baxendale

was only liable for “reasonably foreseeable” harms; here, Putney is being held liable for a harm

that was not foreseeable. Do you see a reason for the difference?

(b) An alternative rule would be for injurers to be held liable for the harm their actions would

have done to a “typical” victim, not the victim they actually injured. Which rule seems better to

you? Why?

(c) This is a case of strict vicarious liability – Putney’s parents are being held liable for

Putney’s action, and Vosburg did not need to prove that the parents themselves were negligent in

how they had raised Putney. Give an argument why a strict vicarious liability rule makes more

sense than a negligent vicarious liability rule, or an argument why a negligence vicarious

liability rule would be better.

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper