Specifically, you will evaluate the overall written quality of the manuscript, as well as its structure, coherence and theoretical argument(s). You…

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.college-experts.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Need assistance on this writing assignment..

CCJ-4700 Journal Article Critique Guidelines

For this assignment, you will be required to conduct a critique of a published, peer-reviewed journal article. Specifically, you will evaluate the overall written quality of the manuscript, as well as its structure, coherence and theoretical argument(s). You will also be critically assessing the methodology of the study. In so doing, critique the conceptualization and measurement of the identified variables, the sampling strategy, data collection instruments, internal and external validity, the study’s adherence to ethical guidelines, and the overall intellectual merit of the investigation. Below is additional information regarding each section of the article that needs to be critiqued, as well as a grading rubric. Your final written assignment should be between 1 and 2 pages that are typed in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1’’ margins. For this particular assignment, do not be concerned with APA formatting. Please be attentive, however, to proper punctuation, grammar, spelling and syntax as these elements will be graded.

Specifically, you will evaluate the overall written quality of the manuscript, as well as its structure, coherence and theoretical argument(s). You…
CCJ-4700 Journal Article Critique Guidelines For this assignment, you will be required to conduct a critique of a published, peer-reviewed journal article. Specifically, you will evaluate the overall written quality of the manuscript, as well as its structure, coherence and theoretical argument(s). You will also be critically assessing the methodology of the study. In so doing, critique the conceptualization and measurement of the identified variables, the sampling strategy, data collection instruments, internal and external validity, the study’s adherence to ethical guidelines, and the overall intellectual merit of the investigation. Below is additional information regarding each section of the article that needs to be critiqued, as well as a grading rubric. Your final written assignment should be between 1 and 2 pages that are typed in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1’’ margins. For this particular assignment, do not be concerned with APA formatting. Please be attentive, however, to proper punctuation, grammar, spelling and syntax as these elements will be graded. ***The initial journal article critique is to be submitted no later than 11:59 P.M. (central) on Friday October 28, 2016, while the second is to be submitted by the same time on Friday November 4, 2016. OVERALL CRITIQUE: Assess the general writing style of the manuscript. In other words, does the structure of the article flow, are the theoretical arguments coherent, are there spelling, grammar or any syntax errors present, and have the author(s) convincingly presented their argument? CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGY: Variables: Where appropriate, assess the measurement validity of the variables, and whether they are adequate indicators of any abstract concepts studied. Also evaluate whether the authors have presented sufficient information regarding the conceptualization of the variables. Data Collection: Assess the sampling strategies the authors employed. In so doing, determine whether ethical guidelines were followed in recruiting participants, whether the sample size was sufficient for analyses and the purposes of the study, whether the findings can be generalized from the sample, whether the sampling frame adequately represented the entire population, etc. Instrumentation: Evaluate how the data were collected and the techniques used. In other words, if a survey or experimental design was employed, did both methods conform to corresponding principles? Were sufficient measures taken to protect against any internal or external validity threats? Evaluation Criteria Excellent Good Needs Improvement Poor Total Overall = 80 points The article critique has proficiently addressed each of the main assignment requirements, demonstrates a high level of critical thinking and has drawn new insight into how the article could be improved. 72-80 The article critique has satisfactorily addressed each of the main assignment requirements, demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking and has drawn some new insight into how the article could be improved. 60-71 The article critique has failed to address each of the main assignment requirements, demonstrates little critical thinking and has failed to identify anyways that the article could be improved. 50-59 The article critique is poorly structured, provides no new insight and has failed to address each of the main assignment requirements. 49 and below Writing style = 20 points The article critique contains zero spelling and/or mechanical mistakes. 18-20 The article critique contains 1-2 spelling and/or mechanical mistakes. 15-17 The article critique contains over 5 spelling and/or mechanical mistakes. 13-14 The article critique is poorly written and unintelligible. 12 and below

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper